Check out Girlistic Magazine's Marriage issue It's free to download. (Activist Tip: Print it out and leave it at your local coffee shop/doctors office for others to read). There are really interesting articles including the herstory of wedding cakes, gender roles in marriage, and legal advice for couples for getting the advantages of marriage, minus the marriage.
I've been mulling over feminism and the institution of marriage lately, being an engaged feminist (A young engaged feminist at that). Mostly I have a fear, since I am a budding feminist (as they say) and have goals of someday being part of a feminist organization and published in the field, that being engaged/married will make me less legitimate as a feminist. That having bought into a patriarchal institution will be seen as contradictory to my goals.
I have considered (and brought up to my partner) the idea of holding off on marriage until the right for all couples (regardless of gender) to marry is recognized. A big, idealistic part of me does not believe that I should thoughtlessly indulge in the privilege that my heterosexual relationship affords me in our society. But what change would this enact? My partner agres with me idealistically, but doesn't believe that us getting marriage or not makes a difference in the larger sense of things.
The next best thing, would be to make sure that the wedding ceremony (and the structure of the resultant marriage) defy all that patriarchal/holy matrimony B.S.
Neither my partner nor I are religious, so having a non-religious officiant is important. Luckily, there is a woman who is certified to do this in Oregon, I found her with a five second google search.
Something I learned about from reading Girlistic Magazine's wedding issue was that one bride and groom walked down the aisle together, rather than her father "giving her away."
I wouldn't be caught dead in a white wedding dress. No matter what my parents prefer to think, I'm not interested in fooling anybody.
Keeping my name (although, technically it is my father's family's name), rather than taking my husbands name. However, this can be difficult in the case of children. Borrowing from evolutionary theory, it is logical that since the matrilineal relation is known with 100% certainty (she gives birth), but the patrilineal relation is not so, the children should take the mother's name. However, a more egalitarian solution would be to hyphenate the names (no matter how terrible it sounds). Should hell freeze over and I produce children someday, they would have the sad fate of having a last name with five syllables and two last names that kind of rhyme but don't.
Finally, an idea that I have been day dreaming about lately in regards to my own wedding has to do with wedding gifts. Instead of a bunch of domestic shit that people will hate buying and we will have to return or never use, I would like to ask people to make donations to an organization. If I had my way, it would be Marriage Equality, USA, a national organization working towards the legal right for samesex couples to enter into civil marriage everywhere in the states.
I'm excited about the challenge of reconciling my personal life with my political interests. Flowers and perfect weather aside, a dream wedding for me would be one that educates others about the inequalities in the institution of marriage in our country.
